The Audit
Read The Audit.
Numbers. Don't. Lie.
One CFO's case for change.
The theory was simple: cut taxes for the wealthy, the benefits trickle down to everyone else. It was wrong. We have had 40 years of data to confirm it.
A 2020 London School of Economics study looked at 50 years of data across 18 countries. Tax cuts for the wealthy increased inequality. They had no measurable effect on GDP or employment. None. 18 countries. 50 years.
By 1988, millionaires had received an average tax cut of $226k from Reagan's cuts. Taxpayers earning $40k got $603. When the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act passed, 81% of the wage gains from the corporate cuts went to the top 10%. The tide came in. One boat rose.
From 1980 to 2014, the top 0.01% of earners saw income grow 386% while the bottom 90% saw their real income fall 3%. Not stagnate. Fall.
“Trickle down was not bad economics. It was wealth transfer dressed as growth strategy.”
Trickle down did not try and fail. The outcome was predictable. Give capital more capital, remove the mechanisms that distribute it, and it concentrates. That is not a market failure. That was the whole point.
Between 1978 and 2023, CEO pay rose 1,000%+. Worker pay rose less than 25%. Source: (EPI, 2024). Layoffs and offshoring became Wall Street growth strategies: cut workers, hit the margin, collect the bonus. The people who absorbed the risk never shared the reward. Real capitalism is supposed to reward the people who take risk and build things. That is not who is winning.
The winners are the ones who bought the company, fired half the workforce, and loaded it with debt. The ones who crashed the global economy in 2008 and kept their jobs. The ones who get a golden parachute for presiding over failure.
“It does not make you a Marxist to say our system of capitalism needs fixing.”
The fix: let companies that make catastrophic bets actually fail. Tie executive pay to long-term outcomes. Stop rewarding financial engineering. Reward building things.
Buy. Borrow. Die.
Real capitalism is supposed to reward risk-takers and punish bad bets. The tax code has quietly removed that requirement for anyone wealthy enough to structure around it.
Workers pay income tax on every dollar they earn. Billionaires borrow against their assets tax-free, because loans aren't income. They live on the debt, die, and pass everything to heirs at stepped-up basis. The embedded gain disappears. No income tax. Ever. On any of it. Entirely legal.
In 40 out of 50 states, undocumented immigrants pay a higher effective state and local tax rate than the top 1% of households (Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy). The people with the least protection in this country are subsidizing the infrastructure used by those with the most.
“This is not a loophole. The code is doing what it was built to do.”
The fix is mechanical: equal tax treatment for capital and labor. Let bad bets fail. Remove the lobbyist exemption from the laws of economics.
With Great Wealth Comes Great Responsibility
Inherited wealth that generates no productive return (compounding through asset appreciation, tax-free borrowing, and stepped-up basis) is capital being withheld from the economy. It does not build companies. It does not employ people. It just accumulates.
Idle capital needs a path back to people who will deploy it. Not as punishment. As economics. The incentive structures that let wealth compound in too few hands forever are not a market outcome. They are a policy choice. Policy can change.
Buy. Borrow. Die.
Accumulate assets. Borrow against them tax-free. Die and pass them to heirs untaxed. See: Yale.
In 1960, 68 out of 100 Americans could afford to buy a home. Today it is 43. (HUD/U.S. Census Bureau) The homes didn't disappear. The equity did. It got absorbed into a system that turned ownership into subscription.
Housing isn't alone. The last 20 years rewired American economic life from owning to renting. You don't buy software, you subscribe. You don't own music, you stream it. You don't own your house anymore. You rent it month to month from an institutional landlord whose interest is yield, not community. That is not a neutral outcome. It is a designed one.
Can Afford to Buy
Americans who can afford homeownership today, down from 68% in 1960. Source: HUD
Uninsured Americans
Americans with no health insurance, in the only G7 nation that ties coverage to employment. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2023
Youth Homeownership
Drop in homeownership among Americans under 35 since 1960. Source: U.S. Census Bureau / PRB
Healthcare compounds the trap. The United States is the only G7 country that ties health insurance to employment. Every other one figured out how to separate them. (Commonwealth Fund) A workforce that can't quit can't bargain. That dependency is worth billions to the people on the other side of it.
“A generation that rents everything builds nothing.”
Among Americans under 35, homeownership is down 10 points since 1960. The generation that was supposed to build equity is paying rent, while the appreciating assets belong to someone else.
A free market requires the ability to participate in it. When healthcare is hostage to employment, when ownership is replaced by subscription, when capital access requires existing capital, what you have isn't a market. You have a system engineered to keep people renting, working, and borrowing from the same institutions that set the terms.
Strip the politics out of immigration and you're left with an accounting problem. Immigrants add to GDP. Removing them costs money and lowers GDP.
Immigrants represent 14.3% of the US population but generated 18% of total economic output in 2023, $2.1 trillion in 2024 dollars.
A February 2026 Cato Institute study found immigrants reduced US deficits by $14.5 trillion over 30 years. Without their contributions, public debt would already top 200% of GDP. Undocumented immigrants alone reduced the deficit by at least $1.7 trillion.
In 40 out of 50 states, undocumented immigrants pay a higher effective state and local tax rate than the top 1% of households. They are paying into Social Security and Medicare, programs they are legally ineligible to collect from.
Deficit Reduction
Immigrants reduced US deficits by $14.5 trillion from 1994 to 2023. Source: Cato Institute, 2026
Economic Output
Immigrants generated $2.1 trillion in economic output in 2023, 18% of the total despite being 14.3% of the population. Source: EPI, 2025
Cost of Deportation
Estimated cost to remove 8.7 million undocumented immigrants, per CBO data cited by Cato Institute
“Mass deportation isn't policy. It's a $1 trillion expense to remove $2 trillion in productive output.”
The immigration debate is about fear and identity. The math is about what happens to your standard of living when you remove the people doing the work. Those are two different conversations, and only one of them is honest.
In 1983, 90% of American media was owned by 50 companies. Today it is six. Those six companies share overlapping institutional shareholders: Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street.
That is not a conspiracy theory. That is a cap table.
Outrage is profitable. Nobody had to issue a memo. They just figured it out. Now layer in AI. A fake video costs less to make than your car payment. Fake quotes. Fake images. By the time the correction runs, the outrage already did its job.
“You are not consuming news. You are consuming a product designed to keep you furious at the wrong people.”
The tell is simple: when a story makes you angrier at your neighbor than at the people setting the price of your insulin, someone is doing their job very well. And it is not a journalist.
We Are The Same
The algorithm needs you to believe you have nothing in common with the person the news told you to hate. The bills disagree.
Strip away the partisan labels and the reality of the American working class is uniform. Not similar. The same.
Healthcare debt that follows you regardless of who you voted for. Corporate landlords who do not know your party, just your rent. Wages that have not moved in real terms since 1979. Student debt that outlasted optimism. A retirement that keeps getting harder to reach. A dollar that is losing its footing while we argue about culture.
“These are not red experiences or blue experiences. They are the same spreadsheet with different names on it.”
In 2004, 93 corporations spent $283 million lobbying Congress for a single tax holiday. They saved $62.5 billion. That is a 22,000% return, peer-reviewed and published in the Journal of Law and Politics. No stock, no fund, no asset class on earth produces that. Lobbying does. Routinely.
Before Citizens United in 2010, outside groups spent $574 million influencing federal elections. By 2024 that number was $4.5 billion, an 8x increase in 14 years.
Add $4.4 billion in federal lobbying in 2024 and you have roughly $9 billion spent in one election cycle to buy access to a government that controls $6.75 trillion in annual spending.
Since Citizens United, dark money groups have spent at least $4.3 billion on federal elections. In 2024 alone, nearly $2 billion in dark money, double the 2020 record.
“Your vote costs nothing to cast. Their outside money buys a 22,000% return. That is not democracy.”
Outside Spending Growth
Outside spending grew from $574M in 2008 to $4.5B in 2024. Source: OpenSecrets, 2025
Single Cycle Access Cost
Combined outside spending and lobbying in the 2024 cycle, purchasing access to a government controlling $6.75 trillion annually. Source: OpenSecrets
Dark Money Since 2010
Total dark money on federal elections since Citizens United, from sources legally never required to be disclosed. Source: Brennan Center
Democratic-aligned groups accounted for the majority of traceable dark money in 2024, led by a single pro-Harris super PAC that took over $136 million in dark money contributions.
Republican-aligned dark money networks spent over $664 million in 2024, including $211 million through the Senate Leadership Fund.
This Is Not a Partisan Issue.
Both parties depend on outside money. Neither will fix it without pressure from outside the system.
Repeal Citizens United. Publicly finance campaigns. The counterargument is that money equals speech. If that is true, then people with no money have nothing to say. That is not a democracy. That is an auction with a voting booth out front.
Every discretionary war is a hidden tax. It shows up in your gas price, your grocery bill, your interest rate, and the value of every dollar you earn. Congress hasn't formally declared war since 1942. Every conflict since was a presidential decision. The bill landed in your mailbox.
Vietnam cost roughly $1 trillion in today's dollars and ended with no strategic victory. Iraq and Syria cost over $2.89 trillion. Afghanistan cost $2.3 trillion over 20 years. Post-9/11 wars combined cost $8 trillion and 900,000 lives, all financed through debt.
Post-9/11 War Cost
Total cost of US post-9/11 wars, not including future interest on debt. Source: Brown University Costs of War, 2021
Vietnam in Today's Dollars
Inflation-adjusted cost of the Vietnam War, which ended with no strategic victory and triggered a decade of inflation. Source: Brown University / DoD
Future Veteran Care
Estimated cost of caring for post-9/11 war veterans through 2050. Source: Brown University Costs of War
Who Pays for War?
Who Decides
Presidents, cabinet officials, and military leadership, none of whom pay more at the pump, service the debt, or lose jobs when inflation hits.
Who Pays
Taxpayers through debt and inflation. Veterans through their bodies and minds. Future generations through interest on borrowed war funding that was never offset by tax increases.
“The bill for every war gets mailed to the people who had no vote in starting it.”
The Findings
I have spent my career in rooms where decisions get made. I have read the term sheets, seen the incentives, and watched the math do its work. Here is what I know: the system isn't broken. It is working exactly as designed. That is the problem.
It is time to change. People cannot afford groceries or childcare. We don't need the world's first trillionaire. We need to fix what is in front of us.
The math on American inequality is not complicated. It is just rarely presented without an agenda attached to it.
“This is the attempt.”
Unaudited.org
